The New York Times last month reported on a study completed in 1973, the results of which had gone unpublished until recently.

How many people killed by dieting could have been saved?

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

The story, headlined “A Study on Fats That Doesn’t Fit the Story Line,” explored a five-year double blind randomized controlled trial–the best method to determine if one thing causes another, according to Times reporter Aaron E. Carroll–designed to test whether saturated fats were more harmful than unsaturated fats.

The results?

Researchers found no evidence indicating that people who reduced saturated fats from their diet experienced health benefits. (This probably comes as no surprise to Intellectual Takeout readers.)

In fact, Carroll reports, “there seemed to be an increased mortality rate in those on the ‘heart healthy’ diet, particularly among those 65 years and older.” (Italics mine)

It gets worse. A meta-analysis of all available studies found that more people died on diets consisting of fewer saturated fats (though the results were not statistically significant).

This article continues at [Intellectual Takeout] Junk Science: When Buried Research Kills People

Check Also
One man’s stand: Trump may be partly conservative, Hillary not at all
At this point, I am not going to announce support for Donald Trump, though I ...