[Wallace] Library group tries to rewrite history by dishonoring 'Little House on the Prairie' author

[Wallace] Library group tries to rewrite history by dishonoring ‘Little House on the Prairie’ author

Opinion
[TownHall.com] Last week, the Association of Library Service to Children renamed the award it gives authors or illustrators whose books “have made, over a period of years, a substantial and lasting contribution to literature for children.” This award used to be called the Laura Ingalls Wilder Award, but the association’s board decided to rename it the Children’s Literature Legacy Award. Why? Because, according to board members, Wilder’s books include “anti-Native and anti-Black” references that fail to represent the association’s “core values of inclusiveness, integrity and respect.”

VIDEO: [Fox News] Former actress from the TV series ‘Little House on the Prairie’ weighs in on the recent decision by the Association for Library Service to Children to rename its Laura Ingalls Wilder Award to the Children’s Literature Legacy Award because, apparently, the books promote racism and sexism.


Wilder wrote about her childhood experiences in a 19th century pioneer family. Perhaps her most famous book, Little House on the Prairie, describes Native Americans as “wild animals” and includes characters who believed “the only good Indian was a dead Indian.”

Despite these references (and others like them), most people in America probably think removing Wilder’s name from an award for Children’s literature is silly. The majority of us have been raised in a Christian tradition (over 70% of us still claim a Christian identity), and we’ve read many of the biblical narratives. As a result, we understand an important distinction that seems lost on those who decided to rename the award:

We understand the difference between descriptive and prescriptive literature.

The Old and New Testaments include both types of prose. The biblical authors described the adulterous activity of King David (2 Samuel 11) and the polygamous lifestyle of King Solomon (1 Kings 11:3), for example, without prescribing these behaviors for their readers. The Bible describes people who engaged in a variety of sinful activities, but Christians who read these passages understand we are not to emulate this behavior.

Similarly, the New Testament authors described early believers who sold all their personal belongings, attended temple on a daily basis, and met together in homes (Acts 2:44-46), without prescribing this behavior for subsequent generations. Christians recognize these first century descriptions are simply that: descriptions of the first century. They are not mandates for future behavior.

This article continues at [TownHall.com] Why Most of Us Think It’s Silly to Remove Wilder’s Name from A Children’s Literature Award

Facebook Comments
Check Also
[Blake] Why Trump's next US Supreme Court appointee is so pivotal to the future of Roe v. Wade
[Blake] Why Trump’s next US Supreme Court appointee is so pivotal to the future of Roe v. Wade
[Washington Post] Anyone promising that Roe v. Wade will be overturned by President Trump’s next ...