dddddddd Review: Defending the Crusades with scholarship | The Christians

Review: Defending the Crusades with scholarship

Myth-buster Rodney Stark sets the record straight on the great endeavor of the Middle Ages

By Steve Weatherbe Oct 17, 2013

Jerusalem taken: Sacking and slaughter was standard practice by Muslims too.
Jerusalem taken: Sacking and slaughter was standard practice by Muslims too.

Nobody debunks bad history better than Rodney Stark. In an impressive and readable series, this sociologist of religion has thoroughly exploded the treasured Enlightenment myth that the Middle Ages were a benighted period when freedom of thought, science and progress were suppressed in Europe, while flourishing in nearby Islam. Stark synthesizes recent scholarship to show Medieval Europe was a place of innovation, in science, production and health, was better off without the classics, and was already moving ahead of Islam and China thanks in large part to Christianity.

God's Battalions: The Case for the Crusades focuses on “the prevailing wisdom” displayed by U.S. presidents such as George W. Bush, Reformation leaders such as Martin Luther, and atheists such as Richard Dawkins, that “during the Crusades, an expansionist, imperialistic Christendom brutalized, looted, and colonized a tolerant and peaceful Islam.”

 The Middle Ages prepared the West to lead the world.Author Stark: The Middle Ages prepared the West to lead the world.

The Muslims started it

“Not so,” writes Stark. “The Crusades were precipitated by Islamic provocations: by centuries of bloody attempts to colonize the West and by sudden new attacks on Christian pilgrims and holy places.”

Was Western Christendom after power and wealth? On the contrary, the effort impoverished individual knights and lords and bankrupted Western kingdoms throughout the Crusading era. Money only flowed eastward.

What about the Crusaders’ sack of Jerusalem when they took it from the Muslims, when the streets reportedly ran ankle-deep with the blood of innocent Jewish civilians? And what of the sack of Constantinople from the Byzantine Christians? Counters Stark: Sacking cities which did not surrender was a standard of medieval warfare, and he cites plenty of examples of Islamic brutality to make his case. As for Constantinople, The Fourth Crusaders captured it after helping a pretender to the throne, who thereupon reneged on payment, leaving the expedition starving and broke.

According to some accounts, the victorious crusaders tried to slaughter all Jews In Jerusalem, but Stark presents evidence that they were treated no more brutally than its Muslims. However, he does not deny that in Europe, Crusading zeal frequently turned into murderous anti-Semitism. But the Crusades were not a papal effort to convert Muslims by the sword. Once the Holy Land was under Crusader control, Muslims were allowed to practice their faith.

See A Glorious Disaster

This book contains three chapters on the Holy Land crusades and one on the crusade against the Asiatic Mongols. It also looks at the intellectual achievements of the High Middle Ages, and how they prepared the West for the modern era.

 Their First Two Thousand Years

Islamic inferiority

What of Islam’s alleged cultural superiority? Stark argues the conquering Arabs were primitive opportunists who invented neither algebra nor hospitals, as is so often claimed. All such advances were the work of conquered Jews, Coptic Christians, Zoroastrians and Hindus. In this book Stark focuses on the West’s military superiority due to far better armor and weapons, stirrups, bigger men and horses due to better nutrition. Islam’s ultimate victory is attributable to logistical considerations, in Stark’s view, such as the onerous costs of long-distance warfare.

Stark does not, however, attempt to prove the Crusades accomplished anything. They did not, after all, stem the Muslim tide, which went on to conquer Balkans. He does rescue their reputation. As soldiers, but not saints, they strove for Christ.

Further reading:

Two Thousand Years. Twelve Volumes. One Story.
Two Thousand Years. Twelve Volumes. One Story.
Two Thousand Years. Twelve Volumes. One Story.
Two Thousand Years. Twelve Volumes. One Story.
Two Thousand Years. Twelve Volumes. One Story.

To read more testimonials of The Christians, click here.


Having trouble thinking of a great birthday preset for the Christian friend who has everything? Happy Birthday! Perhaps we can help you out... for the next TWELVE YEARS!


Viagra, Levitra and Sildenafil 100mg, which reviews are mostly positive, are used exclusively for the temporary elimination of sexual dysfunction. It should be understood that these popular drugs are not stimulants sexual arousal. In the absence of libido Sildenafil Citrate 100mg, Levitra, Cialis, use of which is recommended by doctors, may simply fail. Read more: